Australian govt 1 step closer to storing phone and internet data for...

Australian govt 1 step closer to storing phone and internet data for 2yrs


Reuters / Jason Reed

Journalists and some Australian politicians say legislation making it harder for security agencies to store phone and internet records doesn’t go far enough. The government cites security concerns, but opponents say it’s “an attack on press freedom.”

The new laws, which were passed on Thursday through the lower house and set to be looked at by the senate next week, will now see security agencies needing to obtain a warrants to look at journalists’ records, while a lawyer will also have to decide whether extracting a reporter’s metadata is in the public interest.

The Australian government says this is necessary for security purposes and to help fight terrorism. If the legislation is passed as expected, it will force phone and internet companies to store records, such as IP and email addresses and telephone numbers for a period of two years.

The Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), an Australian trade union, says the legislation compromises press freedom.


Organization chief Paul Murphy said even though lawyers will be consulted to oversee if data should be released, they will still be appointed by the government, thus creating a conflict of interest.

“This is still a process that’s going to be conducted in secret,” Murphy added, speaking to the World Today radio program.

The ‘public interest advocates’, as the lawyers will be known, will be appointed by the prime minister. Current PM Tony Abbott is in favor of giving security agencies greater power to store and record data. However, bizarrely, Abbott tried to compare the current debate regarding metadata to his own experiences as a journalist three decades ago.


“When I was a journalist there were no metadata protections for journalists and if any agency, including the RSPCA [animal protection] or the local council, had wanted my metadata they could’ve just gone and got it on authorization,” he said, adding, “I was perfectly comfortable as a journalist,” according to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).

However, Abbott’s reasoning was slammed by Murphy, who said it was impossible to compare conditions experienced journalists in such different eras.

“For Tony Abbott to compare his time as a journalist to now is ludicrous,” he told the Australian state broadcaster. “Agencies are now given access to an unprecedented amount of data about our lives and work. The volume and type of data now available was beyond imagining in 1980.”

(Via )